The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) describes light symbols as the most complex electronic navigational chart (ENC) symbols in their own published standard for the symbols called IHO Pub S-52, Annex A, Presentation Library. Anyone can download Pub S-52, but the Presentation Library costs 500 euros! Draft copies found online have many errors, and can lead to hours of wasted time with no productive results.
But the IHO does not give themselves all the credit they deserve regarding complex symbols. Let's take a look at the rules for wreck symbols on ENC, for example.
There are six wreck symbols presented below with the official IHO Symbol Explanations, followed by our notes on the required attributes, which are explained in more detail later in the post. Five of the six are essentially the same wreck symbols used on paper charts, but the complexity comes into play because now we know the rules that determine which symbol is used for which category of wreck, and this new specificity is both a virtue and a challenge to those who must display the proper symbols or write books on their meanings. Plus we have the all new concept of isolated danger symbol unique to ENC.
This type of symbol inquiry is good practice working with ENC objects and attributes, which will become more important to mariners as we learn to live without traditional paper charts, relying on the ENC as the only official nautical charts.
______________________________________________________________
Symbol Name: SY(WRECKS01)
IHO Symbol Explanation: wreck showing any portion of hull or superstructure at level of chart datum.
Attributes: VALSOU not given; CATWRK = 4 or 5 or WATLEV = 1, 2, 4, or 5. This symbol means there is no sounding given for the wreck and some part of it is showing at all stages of the tide.
The IHO reference to "chart datum" means "sounding datum," which is always zero tide height on all ENC from any nation.
______________________________________________________________
Symbol Name: SY(WRECKS04)
IHO Symbol Explanation: non-dangerous wreck, depth unknown.
Attributes: VALSOU not given; CATWRK = 1; and WATLEV = 3. In other words, no sounding given, it is charted as not dangerous, and it is always underwater.
______________________________________________________________
Symbol Name: SY(WRECKS05)
IHO Symbol Explanation: dangerous wreck, depth unknown.
Attributes: VALSOU not given; CATWRK = 2; and WATLEV = 3. In other words, no sounding given, charted as dangerous, and always underwater.
Some symbol reference books imply that "dangerous" or "non-dangerous" is determined by the location of the wreck relative to the safety contour, but that is not the case. Dangerous or non-dangerous is coded into the ENC by the Hydrographic Office that made the chart, using rules they set. As noted below, NOAA charts all wrecks known to be shallower than 20.1 m as dangerous, keeping in mind that these are wrecks whose exact soundings are not known.
______________________________________________________________
Wrecks can also be plotted as a generic hazard (meaning rock, wreck, or obstruction) with one of these symbols when the value of sounding (VALSOU) of the wreck is known.
______________________________________________________________
Symbol Name: SY(DANGER01)
IHO Symbol Explanation: underwater hazard with a defined depth.
Attributes: VALSOU less than or equal to the mariner's choice of Safety Depth. The known sounding is then printed in the center of the symbol. Black if less that the safety depth; gray if deeper.
______________________________________________________________
IHO Symbol Explanation: "underwater hazard with depth greater than 20 metres." [SIC]
Attributes: VALSOU greater than the mariner's choice of Safety Depth.
The official IHO Symbol Explanation given above, taken from the latest edition Presentation Library, is not correct. There is a detailed Conditional Symbology Procedure (CSP) explaining when to use this symbol, and it is based on the Safety Depth, not on a fixed 20 meters depth. Both the US and the UK Chart No. 1 booklets include the incorrect reference to 20 meters. Consequently, some navigation apps (ECS) also do not make this depth distinction correctly, so the symbols in those apps do not change from blue to clear at the correct sounding. It is not a major effect navigationally, but reflects the complexity of the symbol.
The known sounding is then printed in the center of the symbol. Black if less that the safety depth; gray if deeper.
______________________________________________________________
IHO Symbol Explanation: isolated danger of depth less than the safety contour.
Attributes: This is a complex, but valuable symbol unique to ENC. It automatically replaces hazard symbols depending on the depth and location of the hazard. It warns us of hazards (based on our own definition of safe depth) that are located in deeper water where we would not expect them.
Specifically, if a wreck is outside of the displayed safety contour and it has a sounding less than the requested safety contour—or its sounding is not given—then the wreck symbol is replaced with the isolated danger symbol—depending on several other properties of the wreck. That procedure applies to all hazards (rocks, wrecks, and obstructions).
Most ENC users are familiar with that role of the isolated danger symbol, but not so many realize that the reference sounding is the requested safety contour, not the displayed safety contour, and this is not at all clear in the IHO Symbol Explanation.
We have in practice two safety contours. We have the one we requested, say 8 m, and we have the one displayed on the screen, which might be 10 m, because only contours native to the ENC can be assigned as the displayed safety contour. This special contour is then made bold and it separates two prominent water colors, and also triggers various alarms when crossed. If our requested contour is not in the ENC, the next deepest contour is selected for display.
For example, we request a safety contour of 8 m, but there is none in the ENC, so the active safety contour displayed is at 10 m. On the deep side of the 10 m safety contour there is a wreck with a sounding of 7 m. This is shallower than our requested 8 m and outside the displayed safety contour at 10 m, so this one will be replaced by an isolated danger symbol.
If we then change our requested safety contour to 6 m, the displayed safety contour will stay at 10m, but now our wreck is deeper than our requested safety contour, so it will not be replaced with an isolated danger symbol.
I might stress that this symbol depends on a value of the safety contour; whereas the distinction between DANGER01 and DANGER02 above (blue or clear inside a dotted oval) depends on the value of the safety depth. Some nav apps (ECS) do not follow the IHO and IMO guidelines of having a user selected safety depth in addition to the safety contour, so they then use the same value for both symbols.
______________________________________________________________
Those are all of the possible symbols for a wreck. Any wreck on the chart will be one of those symbols. The tricky part is how does a specific nav app (electronic charting system, ECS), decide which symbol to show? This is not such an easy question. The rules (outlined briefly above) are spelled out in the S-52 Presentation Library, which in turn depend on the specific attributes of the object WRECK. These attributes are encoded into the ENC using rules from another IHO standard called S-57.
The attributes of the object WRECK that determine how it should be plotted are:
WATLEV, water level effect
VALSOU, value of sounding
CATWRK, category of wreck
EXPSOU, exposition of sounding
Every WRECK must have a WATLEV, plus it must have either a VALSOU or a CATWRK. You can review these attributes at caris.com/s-57.
WATLEV describes the visibility of the wreck as the tide changes. The options are:
ID Meaning
1 partly submerged at high water
2 always dry
3 always under water/submerged
4 covers and uncovers
5 awash
6 subject to inundation or flooding
7 floating
A wreck with WATLEV = 3, always submerged, with no sounding given, will have one of the traditional wreck symbols we are used to from traditional paper charts, WRECKS04 or WRECKS05.
CATWRK can have a direct influence on the symbol used. The options are:
ID Meaning
1 non-dangerous wreck
2 dangerous wreck
3 distributed remains of wreck
4 wreck showing mast/masts
5 wreck showing any portion of hull or superstructure
Each nation making ENC have to establish how they are going to define a wreck as dangerous or not. It is not spelled out in the IHO S-57. NOAA's own Chart Manual, Vol 3, Section 6.3.2 on ENC production states that all NOAA ENC will encode any wreck as dangerous if it is known to be shallower than 20.1 m. They do not need to know its actual sounding, only this limit.
EXPSOU has a more subtle effect on the symbol. The options are:
ID Meaning
1 within the range of depth of the surrounding depth area
2 shoaler than the range of depth of the surrounding depth area
3 deeper than the range of depth of the surrounding depth area
This attribute only affects whether or not a wreck symbol (or any hazard) can show up as an isolated danger symbol. If the exact sounding of a wreck is not known, but it is known that the depth of the wreck is deeper than the shallowest contour of the depth area it is in (ie EXPSOU = 1) then this wreck will not show as an isolated danger symbol. The goal is to avoid the unnecessary display of isolated danger symbols.
______________________________________________________________
Also we note the commonality of all hazard symbols on ENC. For most encounters it does not matter at all if we are avoiding a rock, wreck, or obstruction, and indeed more often than not they have the same symbols.
Here is a graphic summary of the wreck symbols
1. Top of the wreck is 3 m above the water when the tide is zero. The underline means drying height.
2. Sounding not known, but some part of the wreck must show when the tide is zero.
3. Same as 2, but can be in deeper water if tall enough to show when tide is zero, i.e., if it is 5 m tall it could be in a sounding of 4 m.
4. Sounding to the top of the wreck is 5 m, which is less than the safety depth so the sounding is printed black.
5. Encoded in the ENC as dangerous wreck, with no sounding given.
6. Same as 5.
7. Wreck located on the deep side of the displayed safety contour with a sounding less than the requested safety contour, which is usually same as safety depth, or the sounding is not given.
8. Sounding to the top of the wreck is 15 m, which is more than the safety depth so the sounding is printed in gray. Black vs gray on the sounding color is a property of the sounding itself, not the wreck. It changes at the safety depth for all soundings on the screen.
9. Encoded in the ENC as a non-dangerous wreck, with no sounding given.
Note this display uses the 2-color option, but using the 4-color option does not affect the wreck symbols.
A couple last details about the object Sounding (SOUNDG).
A wreck with known sounding can also have an attribute Technique of sounding (TECSOU), and value 6 means "Swept by wire drag," so the the sounding is accurate. When TECSOU=6, the sounding gets underlined with a horizontal bracket, as shown below, which is in a sense a different wreck symbol, but it is actually the sounding symbol, not the wreck, that is different. These are fairly common in some areas.
A circle around any sounding, not just those on a wreck, means the value of the sounding is uncertain. There is an attribute QUASOU, quality of the sounding, that applies to wrecks and soundings in general, which can take on values of:
1 depth known
2 depth unknown3 doubtful sounding4 unreliable sounding5 no bottom found at value shown6 least depth known7 least depth unknown, safe clearance at value shown8 value reported (not surveyed)9 value reported (not confirmed)10 maintained depth11 not regularly maintained.
1 surveyed2 unsurveyed3 inadequately surveyed4 approximate (the old PA from printed charts)5 position doubtful (the old PD from printed charts)6 unreliable7 reported (not surveyed)8 reported (not confirmed)9 estimated10 precisely known11 calculated.
This elaborate presentation in the blog gives me an idea of where the problem could be.
ReplyDeleteI start from the following premises:
A wreck that is partially visible above water should be displayed with symbol WRECKS01.
Specifying VALSOU for a wreck prevents symbol WRECKS01 from being used.
The specification of VALSOU for such wrecks only seems to exist for SHOM data. However, VALSOU is placed in brackets.
Could this mean that these specifications of (VALSOU) should be ignored when assigning the symbol?
That would make perfect sense and the representation on the SHOM online maps is the same.
C-Map, Garmin/Navionics etc. apparently also interpret it this way. They use symbol WRECKS01 and only mention VALSOU in the more detailed information. I only find it different on Meltemus and o-chart charts.
In practice, I consider it dangerous to depict a wreck that is visible above water with the relatively inconspicuous symbol DANGER01.
The ENC symbols should be following an international standard and be the same for all nations—if presented according to the IHO S-52 standards. Can you please give us a link to the "SHOM online maps" you refer to. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteI believe i have found what you are looking at, namely these raster charts at https://data.shom.fr/#001=eyJjIjpbMTc3MTk1LjE3NDY1MzQ0NTAyLDY1NTM0OTAuMTQ2MTQwMzA4XSwieiI6MTMsInIiOjAsImwiOlt7InR5cGUiOiJJTlRFUk5BTF9MQVlFUiIsImlkZW50aWZpZXIiOiJSQVNURVJfTUFSSU5FXzM4NTdfV01UUyIsIm9wYWNpdHkiOjEsInZpc2liaWxpdHkiOnRydWV9LHsidHlwZSI6IklOVEVSTkFMX0xBWUVSIiwiaWRlbnRpZmllciI6IkZEQ19HRUJDT19QWVItUE5HXzM4NTdfV01UUyIsIm9wYWNpdHkiOjEsInZpc2liaWxpdHkiOnRydWV9XX0=
ReplyDeleteThe rasters (copies of paper charts) have different rules for symbols. I am referring only to ENC, not RNC. Also i am not arguing which is better, but for the ENC we do want an international standard. As for third party charts, they have no rules, and each have an EULA claiming we should use official charts and not rely on what they provide. Navionics has many wreck symbol deviations from ENC standards. Not to evaluate them or c-map, but just to note that they are not using ENC standards and they are not official charts.
I'm just a simple sailor. I want to see wrecks that may be completely or partially above water prominently on the nautical chart. In our sailing area, we have a tidal range of between 3 and 11 metres, so that's important for safety. DANGER01 is much more inconspicuous than WRECKS01, in practice too inconspicuous.
ReplyDeleteI have the impression that WRECKS01 is no longer used as soon as VALSOU is indicated on a wreck. Is that why SHOM puts VALUE in brackets, so that it doesn't prevent the useful WRECKS01 symbol?
Your reasoning and goals are perfectly understandable. And in this case it seems you are better off using the raster charts that have the symbols you want, and do not use the ENC, which have different rules for symbols. The ENC rules for the wreck symbols are given in the article above. They are an international standard used on all ENC, worldwide. Those using ENC are accustomed to the symbols and rely on a cursor pick for any symbol that might be unclear.
ReplyDeleteI might just add that mariners in Europe are lucky in that they can choose between the raster charts or the ENC. In the US, the raster charts have been discontinued so mariners use either the ENC or the new NOAA Custom Charts (NCC) which are based on the ENC. Another difference is in the US, raster charts use the international paper chart symbols for wrecks and all hazards, whereas it seems the French rasters have added the drying heights when known.
Thanks for your comments.
Thank you very much for the detailed explanations.
ReplyDeleteYou may be interested to know that SHOM also offers a layer in the online maps that shows the current symbols for the wrecks in red.
https://data.shom.fr/donnees#001=eyJjIjpbMjc2NzAzLjE5NDMxMTcwNDIsNjYzNDc2MC4yMzExNzA5NTNdLCJ6IjoxNiwiciI6MCwibCI6W3sidHlwZSI6IklOVEVSTkFMX0xBWUVSIiwiaWRlbnRpZmllciI6IkVQQVZFU19QWVItUE5HX1dMRF8zODU3X1dNVFMiLCJvcGFjaXR5IjoxLCJ2aXNpYmlsaXR5Ijp0cnVlfSx7InR5cGUiOiJJTlRFUk5BTF9MQVlFUiIsImlkZW50aWZpZXIiOiJSQVNURVJfTUFSSU5FXzM4NTdfV01UUyIsIm9wYWNpdHkiOjEsInZpc2liaWxpdHkiOnRydWV9XX0=