It started with a bike ride home from work, with just enough drizzle to put on rain pants. Ten minutes later however, the wind was at least 25 kts, gusting to 30, with rain heavy enough to reduce visibility to about 200 yards for a short time... not to mention an excellent test of good rain gear. This was an honest to goodness tropical squall, which I have seen many times underway... actually it was not at all a "tropical squall;" it just behaved like one. See Cliff Mass explanation of the system.
After dinner and much banter about the unusual likelihood of such a squall here in Seattle, I happen to notice the trace on one of our Mintaka Duos hanging on the wall. Screen captures are shown below.
|Shown on a 6 hr trace, the bump is at about -2.5h|
|Same data, zoomed to past 3 hr, but captured at a different time.|
We can look at real times since the Mintaka Duo has an accurate clock.
|The cursor is the close dotted line showing the pressure was 1008.4 at 1802 or so, just before the event.|
|The peak pressure of 1009.2 occurred at 1813 (PDT).|
|The pressure continued its pre-bump rise by about 1825.|
The new data here is some documentation of the squall as it also passed over the Atmospheric Sciences Building at UW, which has several fine instruments on the roof, as well as a precision barograph inside the building.
In the earlier note, linked above, we speculated that maybe there was some brief pressurization of the cabin on the boat where the barometer was located, but now there is clear question about that interpretation. Namely the environment of this instrument was rather different from the boat, and also we now have the UW data (below), from an entirely different environment.
|High precision barograph at UW Atmospheric Sciences.|
|Unless their meter is blocked on some level, I know for certain we had much stronger winds at our location.|
|They recorded about a quarter inch of rain in a few minutes.|
|This record of rain gauge bucket tips shows the downpour even more clearly.|
|And as you would expect with a big squall, there was a fast and notable air temperature drop.|
|Likewise as we would expect in a fast moving squall, the wind direction was all over the place.|
So in conclusion, we have clear proof of a squall and some estimate of its severity (there is likely other data on this as it was an unusual event) and we have two independent measurements of the pressure bump, in rather different measurement environments.
Now we just have to figure out what caused this... though there is no doubt that with a good barometer you learn things you would not otherwise. For example, we can see very nicely on the Mintaka Duo the local pressure variations that lead to the sea breeze in Puget Sound on a warm clear day. Later I will write up how racing sailors can use this information to predict the wind while underway in a race on Puget Sound.
PS... it is a bit difficult to tell what took place at West Point Lighthouse because they only record data hourly... but there was definitely some larger scale system in place over the region, which we will have to look up. The Lighthouse data is shown below, with the corresponding pressure trace from a Duo.
|Wind and pressure at West Point. Recall wind in kts is about 2 x wind in m/s. Notice that they had more wind here than at UW, and I would guess somewhat less then I experienced for a short period.|
|This is the corresponding pressure trace from the Duo. We clearly cannot see the details discussed above on this scale.|
Follow up from the next day, Wed Sept 3.
At the office we have many of these instruments running, so I took one to see if we still had detail enough to see the bump, and sure enough in the 3 min data file we see this just fine in all of them, as shown below.
And second, it seems we may have a real meteorological effect here to understand. We need to rig up our Gill Pressure port, and have this set up outside for the next squall to remove all such influences.... unfortunately (in this regard) Seattle has only some 4 or 5 squall days per year.
The other important point to observe is the great value of the data export function of the Mintaka Duo. At 24 h ago, this bump was just barely visible on the instrument screen, but we could just connect it to a computer with a USB cable, export the data to a spread sheet and plot it. The whole process took just a few minutes.
These types of details are much easier to see with a good plot. The above picture is from the 3-min table. I had missed seeing it in the 750 data points of the 1.5 min table and what would have been better still the 15 second table.